Showing posts with label Noel Francisco. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Noel Francisco. Show all posts

Thursday, June 18, 2020

Trump's Filipino American Solicitor General leaving a tumultuous legal legacy

Solicitor General Noel Francisco is leaving his position in July.

The Filipino American who has been one of Donald Trump closest advisors will be leaving his position as Solicitor General of the United States.
Solicitor General Noel Francisco announced his departure from the Department of Justice, effective as of July 3, 2020 and expressed his desire to return to private practice and spend more time with his family
“It has been the honor of my professional career to serve as the Solicitor General of the United States,” said Solicitor General Noel Francisco. “Representing the United States before the Supreme Court is one of the greatest jobs in the law and an opportunity for which I am deeply grateful." 

Francisco has been considering this career move for some time now before the Supreme Court decision upholding the Deferred Action on Childhood Arrivals program which he argued against.

“Solicitor General Noel Francisco has represented the United States superbly before the Supreme Court for the past three Terms,” said Attorney General William P. Barr. “Arguing before the Court 17 times on behalf of the federal government, he has been a principled and persuasive advocate on issues ranging from the separation of powers to religious liberty to vigorous enforcement of federal immigration law. His skilled advocacy has been instrumental to historic victories on behalf of the President’s national security authority, the free speech rights of public employees, and property owners’ access to federal courts, among many other significant accomplishments. 
"Away from the courtroom, he has been a steady and respected leader for the Office of the Solicitor General, a wise counselor to me and others in the Executive Branch, and a good friend. I am grateful for his tireless service to his country and the Department of Justice, and I wish him well in his future endeavors,” said Barr.

Since his appointment in 2017, Noel Francisco has served over three Supreme Court Terms as Solicitor General and has represented the United States before the nation’s highest court in more than 150 merit cases.

Over the course of his impressive tenure as Solicitor General, Francisco argued before the Supreme Court 17 times. 
Some of his victories include:
  • Trump v. Hawaii: upholding the President’s restrictions on travel from countries that present national-security risks.
  • Janus v. AFSCME: holding that the First Amendment prohibits requiring public employees who decline to join a union to pay union dues (overruling a 1977 decision, Abood v. Detroit Bd. of Education).
  • Kisor v. Wilkie: significantly limiting judicial deference to agency interpretations of their own regulations while retaining such deference in core applications.
  • Knick v. Township of Scott: allowing property owners to bring claims for government takings in federal court without first suing in state court (overruling a 1985 decision, Williamson County Regional Planning Comm’n v. Hamilton Bank).
  • Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Comm’n: concluding that Colorado violated the Free Exercise Clause in enforcing its antidiscrimination law against a baker who declined on religious grounds to create a custom cake for a same-sex wedding.

Francisco was also involved in his fair share of legal losses, like the Trump administration's  futile attempts to add a citizenship question to the 2020 Census.

To civil rights advocates arguing against the government, Francisco's chief legal strategy:  If at first you don't succeed, appeal to the Supreme Court, where the conservative-majority justices will hopefully rule in favor of Trump-backed initiatives. 

Francisco's appointment in 2017 was greeted with a degree of apprehension within the Filipino American community, which is mostly made up of first-generation immigrants and strongly opposed Trump's attempts to curtail immigration rules that prioritized family reunification.

“African Americans are not proud that Justice Clarence Thomas is in the U.S. Supreme Court when he consistently rules against the interests of African Americans on virtually every issue," Atty. Rodel Rodis, U.S. Pinoys for Good Governance president and NaFFAA legal counsel, told INQUIRER.net. 
"I don’t believe that we should be proud of Trump’s appointment of Noel Francisco when his job will be to defend Trump’s racist, misogynist, xenophobic policies before the U.S. Supreme Court. He has never taken a position in support of civil rights for minorities. The fact that he has Filipino ancestry is just an accident of birth, nothing for Filipinos to be proud of. He may have the blood but that’s all he has.” 


Wednesday, November 13, 2019

Supreme Court leaning towards Trump's decision to end DACA


ANALYSIS

It doesn't look good for the 700,000 DACA participants.

While hundreds of DACA participants and their supporters marched outside the Supreme Court Tuesday (Nov. 12), inside the nine Supreme Court justices heard arguments for and against Donald Trump's order to dismantle the Deferred Action for Childhood Arrivals policy put into place by President Barack Obama.

Based on their questioning, the five conservative Supreme Court justices appear to allowing Donald Trump end the program that protected the children who were brought by their undocumented parents from being deported.

While about 18,000 DACA enrollees are AAPI, tens of thousands more would become eligible if the program was upheld.

Solicitor General Noel Francisco, a Filipino American, arguing on behalf of the US government, said DACA, was a "temporary stopgap measure" that could be ended legally at any time.

Arguing for the DACA program and its supporters, attorney Ted Olson said federal law requires the government to give a detailed explanation before taking an action that affects hundreds of thousands of people and the businesses that employ them.

The legal question the Supreme Court considered was fairly narrow: Did the administration provide in a pair of memos an adequate explanation for ending the DACA program? There is actually little question that the administration could end DACA if it wanted to; the question is whether this administration took the correct procedural steps to do so, according to Vox.


Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh appeared likely to agree that the Department of Homeland Security had acted properly when it tried to end DACA in 2017, while Chief Justice John Roberts did not seem to be as strongly convinced, NBC News reported.

However, Roberts, who some had thought would be the one conservative justice to switch votes, appeared to lean in favor of the Trump administration's actions.

The liberal justices, led by Justice Sotomayor, the daughter of immigrants, felt that the people most affected by doing away with the problem deserve an explanation.

A decision by the Supreme Court is expected by next Spring, in the heat of primary season. Even if the court majority sides with the plaintiffs, the administration could issue a new memo the next day giving a better explanation.

It would not offer any solace to the DACA participants but at least it would buy them time with the likelihood of another round of court challenges delaying the dismantling of the program. By then, their best hope would be that there be a new White House occupant more sympathetic to their situation.
_____________________________________________________________

Wednesday, September 26, 2018

Filipino American waiting in the wings if Rosenstein is fired or resigns

SCREEN CAPTURE / YOUTUBE
Solicitor General Noel Francisco
THE SON OF A FILIPINO IMMIGRANT might be stepping out of the frying pan and into the fire of the probe of Russian influence on the 2016 U.S. elections.

Solicitor Noel Francisco is next in line to supervise special counsel Robert Mueller’s Russia investigation if Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein resigns or is fired by Donald Trump, who is angry at the direction of the probe headed by special counsel Robert Mueller’s investigation into Russian interference during the 2016 election and whether the Trump campaign coordinated with the Kremlin on those efforts.

Usually, when an Asian American achieves a highly visible position of influence, either as a pop culture icon or a political leader, we would applaud, but in Francisco's case, we're withholding any chest-thumping or pumped fists.


If Francisco were to take over Rosenstein's job as No. 2 in the DOJ, you can pretty much kiss Mueller's investigation goodbye.

The ultra-conservative Supreme Court litigator is the DOJ’s No. 4 official. However, he would take over the Russia probe since Attorney General Jeff Sessions recused himself from the matter and there is no No. 3, afterf former Associate Attorney General Rachel Brand resigned in February, according to The Hill.


Working for President George W. Bush as legal counsel in his White House and as deputy assistant attorney general., Francisco was on the team that argued the critical case of the 2000 Florida election recount team.

In 2005, he joined the influential Washington D.C. law firml Jones Day, which has sent several lawyers into senior Trump posts, including White House Counsel Don McGahn.


It’s pretty clear that Francisco is a partisan lawyer putting his loyalty to Trump over the supposed impartiality of the Justice Department and the FBI,. If he had to make a choice, he would side with Trump over those agencies' traditional independence. That could involve severely limiting the special counsel’s investigation or simply abandoning the investigation entirely.

Some Democrats were quick to oppose the prospect of Francisco overseeing the probe.

“If Rosenstein departs, Noel Francisco should not oversee the Special Counsel investigation. His previous firm Jones Day represents the @realDonaldTrump campaign in the Special Counsel investigation,” Rep. Ted Lieu, D-CA tweeted. “This is a huge conflict of interest.”


As Solicitor General, Francisco represents the Trump White House in cases before the Supreme Court. He helped transform the office from its traditional role as the American people’s advocate before the Supreme Court into a partisan legal representative for Trump views and GOP positions.

Before he received the appointment, as a high-profile attorney he was well-known in that exclusive club of barristers who argue cases in front of the Supreme Court. Francisco solidified his conservative credentials by taking up cases on behalf of big business and fundamentalist beliefs.

Think Progress reminds us that rancisco was one of the tobacco industry‘s top appellate advocates. And he represented the coal company at the heart of a deadly mining disaster — a coal company owned by Trump’s Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross.

In the Supreme Court, Francisco convinced the justices to effectively strip President Obama of the recess appointments power. He represented religious conservatives attacking the Obama administration’s efforts to expand access to birth control. And persuaded the Court to legalize many forms of political bribery
Last term, he successfully fought back a challenge to Trump’s travel ban.

Francisco is the son of a Filipino immigrant, Nemesio Francisco, who moved to the U.S. with little money and not speaking much English, according to Syracuse.com. His father died at 53 of cancer after becoming a doctor in Oswego. His mother, Therese Francisco, still lives in Oswego. He got a bachelor‘s and law degree from the University of Chicago and then clerked for Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia. 

He lives in Washington D.C. with his wife and two daughters, one of which -- interesting enough -- is a Russian adoptee.

If Rosenstein is fired or forced to resign, Francisco's possible appointment as his replacement is no cause for celebration for the AAPI community.
_______________________________________________________________________________

Sunday, May 27, 2018

Sunday Read: FilAm U.S. Solicitor General talks about his immigrant roots



SCREEN CAPTURE / CSPAN
U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco.

EDITOR'S NOTE: U.S. Solicitor General Noel Francisco was the keynote speaker at the Department of Justice's ceremonies honoring AAPI Heritage Month last Thursday, May 14. His remarks follow:

By Noel Francisco, U.S. Solicitor General

IT IS AN HONOR to join you in marking the 40th anniversary of the federal government’s celebration of Asian American and Pacific Islander heritage.  In 1978, Congress passed and President Jimmy Carter signed a joint resolution designating a week in May as “Asian/Pacific American Heritage Week,” and calling “upon the people of the United States, to observe such week with appropriate ceremonies and activities.”  

The idea was a success.  And because everything in the federal government has a tendency to grow, Congress and President George H.W. Bush agreed to expand Asian/Pacific American Heritage Week into Asian/Pacific American Heritage Month.  
The joint resolution observed that May was a fitting month because the first Japanese immigrants arrived in the United States in May 1843 and the transcontinental railroad — which was built largely by Chinese immigrants — was completed in May 1869.  Every President since then has issued a proclamation celebrating May as Asian American and Pacific Islander Heritage Month. 

A few weeks ago, President Trump issued a proclamation honoring the “more than 20 million Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders who call America home” and who “have helped strengthen our communities, industries, Armed Forces, national security, and institutions of governance … [t]hrough their industriousness and love of country.”  In particular, he recognized Kalpana Chawla, the first Indian American woman to fly in space, who served courageously in the space program until the loss of the Space Shuttle Columbia 15 years ago, and Susan Ahn Cuddy, the first Asian-American woman to join the United States Navy, who served as a code breaker and an aerial gunnery officer during World War II.

My Heritage

As I’m sure is true for many of you, the Asian American or Pacific Islander who inspired me most is a member of my family.  My father, Nemesio Maharice Francisco, was born and raised in the Philippines.  I’d like to tell you three stories about him—stories that will likely echo those that many of you could tell about your own families.

The first is a story of adversity.  My father was born in 1935, and grew up amidst the ravage of World War II.  At that time, the Philippines was a commonwealth, still under the formal control of the United States but transitioning toward independence.  Within hours of the attack on Pearl Harbor, the Philippines was also attacked.  As a very young boy, my father was driven from his home by invading soldiers.  He once told me how, for days, he was forced to live in the remnants of a bombed out tank.  
My father’s family pooled all of their resources to send him—the youngest son—to medical school and, eventually, to the United States, where he met my mother.  That’s, of course, where my story began.  And isn’t that the story of many of us?  We came here on the shoulders of immigrants who had the courage to cross oceans in search of a better life.

The second is a story about politics — in the best sense of that word.  I remember my father and mother having an argument about a political donation that my father made to President Reagan’s re-election campaign.  My mother learned about it when my father got the perfunctory thank-you note in the mail along with the auto-penned photograph of the President.  Now, my mother had grown up in a Teamsters household, but I don’t think she was objecting to my father’s support for President Reagan.  She just couldn’t believe that he had wasted so much money on a campaign contribution.  But my father was so proud of that auto-penned photo.  And it was only many years later that I began to understand why.  It was because he had come to understand that he was an American, and he was actively participating in our democratic process.
The third story occurred shortly before my father’s death in 1989.  My father had come to this country with a group of Filipino doctors many years earlier, and he was now dying of lung cancer.  The other Filipino doctors and their families — known to me as my “aunties, uncles, and cousins” — came to say goodbye.  And what struck me was how all of my “cousins” and I looked alike.  And it wasn’t our jet black hair and brown skin.  Rather, in the fashion of the time, all of us boys had pony tails and earrings.  I don’t think our parents liked it all that much.  But what was clear was how thoroughly American all of us were, just one generation later.

To me, these three stories about my father tell a distinctly American story.  And I suspect many of you in this room could tell similar tales.  No matter what other divisions may exist in our society, these stories unite us as Americans.

Trailblazers in Public Service

All of us here are also united by our choice to work in public service, and we owe a debt of gratitude to our forebears who blazed the trail for us in this field.

I think, for example, of Herbert Choy, who was born to Korean immigrant parents in Hawaii in 1916.  As a young teenager, he worked long days at a pineapple processing plant for twelve-and-a-half cents an hour.  He dreamed of being a lawyer, even though at that time no Korean American had ever become a member of the bar.  Through his hard work, he earned admission to Harvard Law School, graduated in the spring of 1941, and became the first Korean American bar member in November of that year. 

When Pearl Harbor was attacked in December, he volunteered for the United States Army the next day.  He served six years in the JAG Corps, including deployments to Japan and Korea.  When he returned home, he went into private practice, served as Attorney General of the Hawaii Territory, and was appointed in 1971 by President Nixon to fill Hawaii’s first seat on the Ninth Circuit.  That made him the first Asian American to serve as a federal judge, a role he filled with distinction for 33 years until his death in 2004. 

One of his first law clerks was Richard Clifton, who later became the second Hawaiian to serve on the Ninth Circuit.  Judge Clifton said that Judge Choy taught him “to render judgments without being judgmental … to disagree without being disagreeable.  He understood that the law is there for the entire community and that it should be administered fairly.”  That is an inspiring legacy for us all.

Others blazed the trail into public service in different ways.  After Pearl Harbor, Japanese Americans in the military were forced to surrender their weapons, and many were sent with their families to internment camps.  Eventually, President Roosevelt — against the advice of the Army — agreed to authorize one combat team of Japanese American volunteers.  “Americanism,” he said, “is a matter of the mind and heart; Americanism is not, and never was, a matter of race or ancestry.”  
The 442nd Regimental Combat Team went on to become, by some measures, the most decorated unit in the history of the United States military.  When the famous Lost Battalion of Texas was surrounded by enemy forces in the mountains of France, the 442nd battalion took 800 casualties to rescue them — a mission that later led the Governor of Texas to name every man in the unit any honorary Texan.  By the end of the war, the soldiers of this single battalion had earned an astonishing 21 Medals of Honor.  In 1946, a battalion that was almost never formed because of racial prejudice was personally welcomed home by President Harry Truman.

The men of the 442nd — and other Asian Pacific Americans who volunteered during the war — continued to serve, even during peace.  One member of the unit was Lieutenant Daniel Inouye, who was severely wounded taking out two enemy machine gun nests in Italy.  He had always wanted to be a surgeon, but his wounds cost him one of his arms.   He was inspired to take a different path by a fellow wounded soldier that he met in a military hospital.  That soldier told him he planned to recover, go to law school, and then run for Congress in his home state of Kansas.  Inouye did the same thing in Hawaii.  Just over a decade later, Daniel Inouye shook hands on the floor of the Senate with his fellow soldier and senator, a man named Bob Dole. 

Inspiring Progress in Public Service and the Law

Thanks to pioneers like Judge Choy and Senator Inouye, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have come a long way in American public life, and that progress continues.  It should inspire us all that America’s face to the world — our ambassador at the United Nations — is a brilliant and strong Indian American woman, Nikki Haley.  The mighty Pacific force of the United States Navy, the fleet that liberated my father in the Philippines, is now commanded by Harry Harris — the first Japanese American Admiral in the Navy.  And President Trump recently nominated Admiral Harris to serve as United States Ambassador to South Korea, where he will play a key role in the President’s effort to address the difficult issues in the Korean Peninsula.

Of particular importance to us at the Department of Justice, Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders have made great strides in the law.  Over the past 30 years, the number of Asian American law students has quadrupled, and over the past 15 years, the number of Asian American lawyers in the United States has doubled.  And I am honored to be the first Asian American or Pacific Islander to represent the United States in the Supreme Court as the Solicitor General. 

But I am certainly not the only one to argue in the Court.  By my count, Asian American or Pacific Islander advocates presented 16 arguments at the Supreme Court this term.   I am not aware of any official statistics, but I think that is very likely a record.  One fact that should make us even prouder is that 15 of those 16 arguments were presented by current or former members of the Justice Department, including former Acting Solicitor General Neal Katyal, former Assistant to the Solicitor General Kannon Shanmugam, former Assistant to the Solicitor General Pratik Shah, and current Assistant to the Solicitor General Fred Liu.  Other DOJ alumni advocates included the Solicitor General and Deputy Solicitor General of the District of Columbia, Todd Kim and Loren Ali-Khan, and Professor Aditya Bamzai of the University of Virginia Law School.

Asian American and Pacific Islander lawyers are also assuming more prominent roles throughout our Department.  The U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia is my dear friend, Jessie Liu — the first Asian American to hold that prestigious position.  Our colleague Robert Hur, who recently served as the principal deputy to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein here at Main Justice, has succeeded the DAG as U.S. Attorney for the District of Maryland.  And B.J. Pak is the first Asian American U.S. Attorney to serve in Georgia, where he leads the important office for the Northern District of Georgia.

Of even more enduring significance, there are now far more Asian American and Pacific Islander federal judges than ever before.  A decade ago, there was only one Asian American federal court of appeals judge:  Judge Atushi Wallace Tashima of the Ninth Circuit.  Today, there are eight.  Four were appointed by President Obama:  Judge Denny Chin of the Second Circuit, a former Assistant United States Attorney, Judge Jacqueline Nguyen of the Ninth Circuit, also a former Assistant United States Attorney , Judge Sri Srinivasan of the D.C. Circuit, a former Assistant and Principal Deputy Solicitor General, and Judge Raymond Chen of the Federal Circuit, a former Solicitor of the Patent and Trademark Office. 

In just over a year, President Trump has appointed another three federal court of appeals judges of Asian American or Pacific Islander descent:  Judge Amul Thapar of the Sixth Circuit, a former United States Attorney for the District of Kentucky and District Judge who was the first South Asian American to sit on an Article III court, Judge James Ho of the Fifth Circuit, a veteran of the Office of Legal Counsel and the Civil Rights Division who immigrated from Taiwan and learned to speak English by watching Sesame Street, and Judge John Nalbandian of the Sixth Circuit, a talented appellate advocate whose mother was born in a Japanese internment camp during World War II.

Our Continuing Mission

All of us can be proud of that progress, but we still have work to do.  Although Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders are thriving in American society and are better represented in the institutions of government than ever before, we must continue striving to make our country a place of justice and opportunity for all.  For those of us here at the Department, that means faithfully enforcing the rule of law and ensuring that the promise of freedom that inspired our ancestors to come this country remains real for everyone who calls America home.  It also means continuing to promote diversity broadly defined, including the diversity of viewpoints.  And that doesn’t just mean tolerating the presence or views of others.  It means welcoming civil disagreement, and listening with an open mind.  

As Justice Scalia once put it, “One of the strengths of this great country, one of the reasons we really are a symbol of light and hope for the world, is the way in which people of different faiths, different races, different national origins, have come together and learned — not merely to tolerate one another, because I think that is too stingy a word for what we have achieved — but to respect and love one another.”

It’s hard to top Justice Scalia for rhetorical flourish.  So like the loyal law clerk I once was, I think I’ll let him have the last word.  Thank you for the invitation to join you in celebrating the heritage we share and the country we love.
_____________________________________________________________________________

Wednesday, March 8, 2017

Trump picks a Filipino/American to be his Solicitor General

CSPAN
Noel Francisco
TO NO ONE'S SURPRISE, a Filipino/American attorney got nominated to be the next Solicitor General, just not the Filipino/American everyone was expecting to be named.

Mr. Trump picked Noel Francisco yesterday (March 7), currently the acting Solicitor General, to become the government's lawyer in front of the U.S. Supreme Court.

The other FilAm attorney up for the job was George Conway, husband of Trump's senior advisor Kellyanne Conway. Because of her close ties to Trump and other members of the White House staff, it was thought that her husband would have a sllight edge over the other half-dozen candidates.

Prior to his nomination Francisco, until this year was a partner at the Jones Day law firm and a former Justice Department official under George W. Bush.

The 47-year-old Francisco, who would be the nation's 47th solicitor general, has been filling the vacancy in that office since being named principal deputy solicitor general in January.


Francisco has well-established conservative credentials. He represented the Noel Canning Corporation in its successful challenge to President Obama's recess appointments to the National Labor Relations Board. He also represented R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company in a successful First Amendment challenge to a federal regulation requiring cigarette manufacturers to display graphic warnings on cigarette packages; the Free Enterprise Fund in a successful challenge to the constitutionality of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board; and the International Coal Group in connection with a congressional investigation into the January 2, 2006 Sago Mine accident in Sago, West Virginia. 

Francisco was raised in Oswego, N.Y. He received his B.A. with honors in 1991 from the University of Chicago. He received his J.D. with high honors in 1996 from the University of Chicago Law School. 


After law school, Francisco served as a law clerk first for Judge J. Michael Luttig of the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, and then for Associate Justice Antonin Scalia of the United States Supreme Court.
###