US Census: Leaked documents reveal plans to stop collecting race & ethnicity data

                                                                                                                      Pew Research Center

If they don’t count us, we don’t exist — and that’s precisely the point. Donald Trump and his followers would like nothing better than to have people of color disappear.

Leaked draft proposals reveal the Trump administration is pushing to erase race and ethnicity categories from the 2030 US Census, a move Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) leaders and civil rights advocates warn is a calculated strike to strip political power, gut federal funding, and force non-white communities into back to society's edges —uncounted and unseen.

Under the guise of streamlining government, draft proposals first reported by
Talking Points Memo frame the sweeping changes as routine administrative housekeeping:

Official rhetoric claims dropping race and ethnicity questions simplifies the questionnaire, cuts costs, and saves households a few minutes.

Administration allies argue that classifying residents by race promotes "racial stereotyping" and triggers reverse discrimination, pushing a rigid "colorblind" policy onto national data collection.

The regime's alleged proposal redirects government focus toward collecting strict legal status and citizenship metrics — a clear precursor to not counting noncitizens from congressional apportionment and redistricting counts.

A direct blow to AANHPI visibility

For AANHPI communities—currently the fastest-growing demographic in the country—stripping these metrics threatens to undo decades of progress toward data disaggregation, the vital process that exposes severe inequalities hidden beneath broad labels.

• Burying Subgroup Disparities: The "model minority" myth relies on aggregated data to paint a picture of universal success. Broad "Asian American" stats mask stark realities: while overall averages look prosperous on paper, disaggregated data shows groups like Burmese Americans face poverty rates as high as 39%. Scrapping ethnicity tracking leaves these critical needs completely undetected by policymakers.

• Gutting Language Access & Local Funding: Trillions in federal funding for public education, community health centers, and emergency services depend on hyper-local census counts. Without granular demographic data, local governments will lose both the funding and the legal mandate to provide crucial non-English language services.

Pew Research Center

Stripping away civil rights and political power

The stakes extend far beyond federal dollars — they strike at the core of legal protections and democratic representation for all communities of color. We've witnessed the regime's attack against inclusion and diversity, the lack of data would make it next to impossible to prove the need for equal rights.

• Eroding Voting Rights: If the historically disenfranchised  ever want  the Voting Rights Act back to spot gerrymandering and stop vote dilution, racial and ethnic data is the first step. Without baseline census figures, proving illegal district manipulation in court becomes almost impossible.

• Neutering Civil Rights Accountability: From fair housing audits to employment discrimination claims, establishing "disparate impact" requires statistical proof. Scrubbing racial categories deprives civil rights agencies and citizens of the evidence needed to hold institutions accountable under the law.

Corporations would be happy

Perhaps not too surprising but the elimination of racial and ethnic data would make corporations happy. For 60 years, in order to comply with federal regulations, the private sector begrudgingly installed DEI programs to improve their workforce representation. The corporations have also had to submit reports about the gender, racial and ethnic composition of their workforces

For 60 years, private businesses have had to submit their hiring data to make sure that the corporations are not discriminating by gender, race or ethnicity in their hiring or promotions. Without that data, it would be harder for employees or equal rights advocates to bring charges of discrimination.

And there's the bottom line to consider. Tracking and auditing demographic data requires dedicated software, time, and human resources. Many for-profit companies believe this requirement to be an unnecessary financial burden.

The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission has already issued a proposal reflecting what the Trump regime wants to do with the federal workforce. The EEOC's Republican majority voted 2-1 last month to rescind the data collection requirement, submitting the proposal to a 30-day public commentary period before final approval. 

EEOC Chair Andrea Lucas, an outspoken critic of diversity and inclusion, argues that requiring companies to submit the annual demographic reports risks encouraging companies to justify discriminatory practices to diversify their workforce.

"It may promote racial stereotyping at work, and it may encourage employers to engage in discrimination," Lucas said during a hearing.

View from the edge

If you think you are seen, think again. The federal government is playing peek-a-boo with our community. Just when we thought we were finally getting counted, they pulled the rug out.

The quiet battle happening inside the Department of Commerce could completely change the 2030 Census. They want to stop collecting race and ethnicity data. They want to act like we do not exist. Conservative groups say these questions are too hard. But without this data, we cannot fight for our rights. Civil rights groups warn this will hurt our voting power.

For years, we have been lumped together as one huge group. That hides the truth. It makes us invisible.

Each group has different needs. When you mix us all together, you miss the high poverty rates in some communities. You miss the health struggles in others. You support the false idea that all Asians are doing great.

Last year, things looked good. The government passed Statistical Policy Directive No. 15 (SPD 15). It promised to make detailed subgroup tracking the standard.

Now, those plans are dead. The Census Bureau quietly cancelled these updates for the upcoming 2027 American Community Survey (ACS). They pushed the deadlines way back to 2029. Advocacy groups like SEARAC and AAPIData are sounding the alarm. They know that delayed justice is denied justice.

“Disaggregated data is not optional; it’s essential,” said Quyên Đinh, Executive Director of SEARAC. “Without it, Southeast Asian American communities remain unseen and underserved. The updated data standards in SPD 15 are necessary to ensure our communities are visible in the data that drive decisions on resources, services, and policies.

Advocates aren't buying the administrative excuses. This isn't about saving paperwork or streamlining government — it is a deliberate political attempt to advance a "colorblind" mandate that erases diversity, dilutes minority political power, and masks entrenched racial inequities. 

Community advocates emphasize that data collection is fundamental to equity, noting that a community cannot be served if it is not counted. Community groups are already mobilizing to oppose the proposal, vowing to fight any policy changes that threaten to render minority communities invisible in federal accounting.

If you do not count us, you cannot serve us. Without separate numbers for each group, our schools will not get money for language help. Our health clinics will not get tools to fight specific diseases.

We cannot let them make us invisible again. We have to stand up and demand to be counted.

EDITOR'S NOTE: For additional commentary, news, views and chismis from an AANHPI perspective, follow me on Threads, on X, BlueSky or at the blog Views From the Edge. If you find this perspective interesting, please repost.

San Jose’s Asian supermarket and retail boom signals a broader shift in suburban America

T&T Supermarket opening is catering to San Jose's Asian-centric tastes.

There is an old saying across the diaspora: "If you want to know where a community is going, look at where it buys its groceries and spends its weekends."

If that rule holds water, then Asian Americans aren’t merely arriving in San Jose—we are actively redrawing its blueprints. Within a matter of weeks, California's third-largest city has become the epicenter of a massive, multinational Asian retail explosion.

First came Canadian retail juggernaut T&T Supermarket, making its high-profile U.S. debut at Westgate Center on June 18, 2026. Less than a week later, downtown welcomed Sakura Market, a sleek, 5,000-square-foot Japanese konbini convenience hub. Not to be outdone, regional staple Dai Thanh Supermarket scaled up radically, launching a 27,300-square-foot flagship store in South San Jose on July 24, 2026.

This isn't a flash-in-the-pan trend; it's a structural metamorphosis of Silicon Valley. Corporate bets of this scale don't happen without hard, undeniable data. According to US Census Bureau figures, San Jose’s Asian population has grown to 419,775 residents—comprising roughly 40% of the city. In neighborhoods like the 95148 ZIP code (Evergreen), density peaks at over 30,000 Asian residents.

This immense concentration of economic capital is precisely what major commercial developers need to justify multi-million-dollar infrastructure investments.

The economic and educational magnets

Why San Jose, and why now? The answer lies at the intersection of high-wage tech economies and competitive public education.

Silicon Valley’s tech workforce relies on a global pipeline: 66% of local tech workers are foreign-born, with half originating from Asian nations, particularly India (23%) and China (18%). This dynamic fosters a self-reinforcing "enclave economy." High tech salaries generate disposable income, which flows directly back into high-end ethnic spaces like China Live, local real estate, and municipal tax bases.

Equally decisive is the academic pipeline. Elite regional institutions like Stanford and UC Berkeley pull top talent from across Asia. When these professionals settle down, they seek out school districts with proven academic track records. Districts like Cupertino Union and Evergreen function as geographic magnets; Asian families deliberately pay a premium on housing to secure access to top-performing schools, cementing long-term residential roots.

The retail metamorphosis: Westfield Valley Fair goes Asian-centric

Nowhere is this demographic wave more visually striking than at Westfield Valley Fair. Walk through the corridors of this premier Silicon Valley shopping center on any given afternoon, and the cultural pivot is unmistakable. In a reversal of classic 20th-century American mall demographics, it often feels as though 80% of shoppers are of Asian descent—a living mosaic of Mandarin, Vietnamese, Tagalog, Hindi, and Korean.

The mall has adapted organically to its primary consumer, evolving from a conventional Western retail hub into an Asian-centric lifestyle destination. The jewel of Valley Fair's culinary landscape is the sprawling, two-story China Live restaurant.

Modeled after its flagship in San Francisco, the multi-concept venue acts as a cultural anchor, complete with exhibition kitchens, tea lounges, and artisanal ingredient markets that mimic the energy of an elevated night market. Alongside regional boba spots and international Asian fashion houses, it cements the mall as a community space tailored to Asian American habits and tastes.

On some days, San Jose's Westfield Valley Fair mall feels like it could be in Asia.

The economic and educational magnets

Why San Jose, and why now? The answer lies at the intersection of high-wage tech economies and competitive public education.

Silicon Valley’s tech workforce relies on a global pipeline: 66% of local tech workers are foreign-born, with half originating from Asian nations, particularly India (23%) and China (18%). This dynamic fosters a self-reinforcing "enclave economy." High tech salaries generate disposable income, which flows directly back into high-end ethnic spaces like China Live, local real estate, and municipal tax bases.

Equally decisive is the academic pipeline. Elite regional institutions like Stanford and UC Berkeley pull top talent from across Asia. 

When these professionals settle down, they seek out school districts with proven academic track records. Districts like Cupertino Union and Evergreen function as geographic magnets; Asian families deliberately pay a premium on housing to secure access to top-performing schools, cementing long-term residential roots.

From supermarket Aisles to city hall

As the demographic weight of the AAPI community has expanded, local political leverage has naturally followed. The economic influence seen in grocery aisles and luxury malls translates into representation at local and national levels.

San Jose’s governance features prominent AAPI voices reflecting this shift. Leaders like District 7 Councilmember Bien Doan—defending his seat in the 2026 local election cycle—and District 1 Councilmember Rosemary Kamei represent an increasingly engaged electorate.

Regionally, the South Bay is anchored by national figures like U.S. Representative Ro Khanna, an Indian American.

Across the country, this trend is escalating: by the end of 2026, eight major U.S. cities—including neighboring Fremont, California — will be led by Asian American mayors. The AAPI demographic is no longer treated as a passive bloc; it is actively shaping policy.

AAPI marchers in support of San Jose's apology for burning down Chinatown.

Pride, crossover appeal, and friction

On the ground, reactions reflect a blend of cultural pride, commercial optimism, and civic validation.

At the grand opening of Sakura Market downtown, San Jose Downtown Association CEO Brian Kurtz pointed to the symbolism of the market's arrival, noting that sakura (cherry blossom) signifies renewal—a fitting metaphor for downtown urban recovery.

For many AAPI residents, these venues provide a tangible connection to identity and heritage. Local shopper Anita Koyanagi noted her excitement over seeing Japanese-style convenience culture take root locally after traveling abroad, calling it "a big step forward for San Jose."

        RELATED: Asian mega-market boom signals a shift in Bay Area suburbs

Even non-Asian residents are embracing the shift. Experiential retail elements—like T&T’s live seafood tanks and Sakura’s custom ramen bars—offer broad crossover appeal, recasting specialty supermarkets as mainstream lifestyle amenities.

Naturally, rapid transition brings localized friction. On neighborhood forums and in community meetings, some long-term residents express quiet anxieties over changing commercial landscapes, noting the displacement of traditional American supermarket chains or complaining about opening-week traffic congestion near Valley Fair and Westgate. Yet, the prevailing sentiment remains positive, with most locals viewing these developments as net positives that boost commercial activity, elevate property values, and enrich the city's culinary terrain.

View from the Edge: Redefining the suburban mainstream

For decades, the story of Asian immigration to American suburbs was framed around assimilation—fitting into a pre-existing blueprint. What is happening in San Jose turns that narrative on its head: the infrastructure itself is adapting to the community.


When a multi-million-dollar Canadian grocery giant selects a Bay Area suburb for its U.S. flagship, or when developers build multi-story culinary destinations dedicated to Chinese regional cuisine inside premier shopping malls, it signals more than retail expansion. It demonstrates that the Asian American community has transitioned from a niche demographic into the core economic, cultural, and civic driver of the region.

Looking at the broader American landscape, San Jose is not an anomaly; it is a preview.

San Jose is not necessarily a universal blueprint for every American town, but rather a preview for a specific subset of suburbs. As secondary hubs across the Sunbelt, Pacific Northwest, and East Coast reach critical thresholds of high-wage tech jobs, academic anchors, and AAPI population growth, similar cultural and commercial transformations will likely follow.

In these specific markets, diversity is no longer measured merely by presence along the margins, but by who builds the anchors, who fills the malls, and who writes the stories, who fills the political offices and who redefines the local mainstream.

EDITOR'S NOTE: For additional commentary, news, views and chismis from an AANHPI perspective, follow me on Threads, on X, BlueSky or at the blog Views From the Edge. If you find this perspective interesting, please repost.