Showing posts with label AAAJ-LA. Show all posts
Showing posts with label AAAJ-LA. Show all posts

Friday, April 29, 2022

L.A. Riots' 30th Anny: Rreflections on 'SAIGU,' when injustice reigned and the city burned

TWITTER
Armed Korean Americans protected their businesses during the Rodney King riot.

Thirty years ago, I was still enjoying the best years of my journalistic career as a copy editor at the Oakland Tribune, at the time, the only major black-owned newspaper in the country, when the Los Angeles riots broke out.

In the Tribune newsroom I was transfixed watching TV and reading the wire stories on the burning and looting. For most Americans, the major images that stood  was of entire blocks aflame in the black community and Korean Americans on the rooftops of their businesses brandishing guns trying to defend the buildings from their black neighbors.

The Black and Asian journalists in the Tribune newsroom took a deep breath and put on their professional faces and tried to appear objective, but the furrowed brows were hard to miss.

Almost forgotten in the ensuing days was the incident that sparked the unrest and the following police reaction: a jury acquitted four white police officers in the beating of Black motorist Rodney King.

Among Korean Americans, the L.A. riots became known as "Saigu," which translates to  April 29, the first day of the week-long riots.

“Saigu has become almost like a memorial for Korean Americans,” Connie Chung Joe, chief executive officer of Asian Americans Advancing Justice — Los Angeles, told NBC Asian America. “It’s a moment of profound sadness and loss, of feeling so targeted and so abandoned.”

Black and Asian civil rights leaders involved in the aftermath of the unrest in 1992 gathered recently to discuss past news coverage, how it impacted racial tensions and what members of the press can do to change the divisive narrative.

Following is the press release issued by Asian Americans Advancing Justice about the panel discussing the news coverage of those days when L.A. burned.

* * *

In an April 14 virtual panel titled "LA Uprising / Saigu Reflections: Race Relations Then and Now," speakers included Civil Rights Attorney Connie Rice, Attorney Mediator Angela Oh, Founder of Asian Americans Advancing Justice-LA Stewart Kwoh, and USC Professor/President of the National Association of Black Journalists Jarrett Hill. The virtual panel was hosted by Connie Chung Joe (CEO, AAAJ- LA) and moderated by Monica Lozano (former CEO, La Opinion).

On April 29, 1992, four white police officers were acquitted for the brutal beating of an African American man, Rodney King, which had been caught on tape. The verdict was followed by five days of unrest in Los Angeles in which more than 60 people lost their lives and an estimated $1 billion of damage was done in what dominant media labeled as race-related violence instead of injustice-related. 

They failed to acknowledge the systematic and institutional causes of economic inequality, legal injustice, and police brutality were the primary causes of the incident.

For the Korean American community, the word “SAIGU,” which means 4.29, commemorates the day the Uprising began. $400 million of the property damages occurred to Korean-owned businesses, including Koreatown being heavily hit.

Leading up to the 30th anniversary of LA’s 1992 civil unrest, the panel urged the audience -- comprised of members of the press, students, and advocates–to reframe future narratives by focusing on the real issues of bias and oppression instead of sensationalized stereotypes. With the Black Lives Matter and Stop Asian Hate movements underway, dominant media have the obligation to self-reflect on its role in reporting and focus the political and economic history of race relations in Los Angeles and across the United States.

DOJ
30 years ago, a Korean American watched buldings burn.


Civil Rights Leader Connie Rice, highlighted how the Rodney King video was the kindling that lit the fire of social issues which had been affecting the African American community in L.A. for generations, with the dominant media only focused on branding the community as criminals rather than talk about the economic gaps;

"For the working class and poor African Americans, they had seen 80,000 jobs leave the South Central area. When your entire economic base leaves, you are going to have a gap there and people fall through the cracks, and then you have an emerging and gang culture and of course the dominant media covered most Blacks in LA as criminals and as being violent because that was what the elite communities feared," she expressed.

For the African American community, the 1992 LA Uprising left a deep wound, one which embodied racial, economic and political injustice. There was a struggle to define community identity against the backdrop of the City removing all pillars of systemic support. The dominant media ignored this and instead labeled African Americans as the aggressor and Korean Americans as the aggressed, pitting one community against the other.

Attorney Mediator Angela Oh, explained why the word SAIGU defined the consequences the Korean American community experienced in LA as a result of the dominant media only portraying the community implementing vigilante justice.

"The Korean American community which the dominant media did not see experienced many issues. There were issues around suicide and mental health which didn’t get covered in any media. Children had to give up their education futures because they had to help their parents rebuild. The entire situation was truly dispiriting," she said.
Founder of Asian Americans Advancing Justice – LA Stewart Kwoh, made the point that a multi-racial democracy really depends on dominant media which is fair, accurate and avoids pitting one group against another;

"We went to the LA Times and said a small percentage of Korean Americans were trying to protect their businesses with guns, but that was the only image shown by the LA Times. It was inaccurate, imbalanced and it took everything out of context on the injustices faced by both communities – whether Korean American or African American," Kwoh strongly stated.


University of Southern California Professor/President of the National Association of Black Journalists, Jarrett Hill provided some observations on the how the dominant media has covered topics dealing with race, civil uprising and communities and how diversity in the newsrooms needs to be extended to decision makers.

"I think one of the things we have to recognize first is that the dominant media’s role has never been about upholding a multi-racial democracy. We are trying to change the system and bend it to the needs of what we need for it to reflect, so this is why we need to diversify our newsrooms and not just for interns or news reporters but also for editors, directors and the owners of these media companies," he emphasized.

* * *
Here's the answer to Question No. 2: Has coverage of minority communities improved?



A footnote: 

Unable to survive the Recession, later that year in 1992, Robert C. Maynard, had to alter his dream of holding the Tribune as an example of a diverse newsroom and journalists of color were just as talented as their white peers. The owner of the Trib -- a better journalist and human being than a businessman -- was forced to sell his newspaper to his competitors, the Alameda News Group part of the white-owned Media News Group chain. 

The wonderfully diverse newsroom, which was not dominated by white males, was scattered to the winds to other publications throughout the nation.

Maynard's dream of diversifying the ranks of journalists lives on in the Maynard Institute for Journalism Education. Atop the Institute's website, a quote from Maynard resonates today as we mark the 30th anniversary of the Rodney King Riots: 

“Newsrooms have a responsibility to cure the legacy of racism.”

EDITOR'S NOTE: For additional commentary, news and views from an AAPI perspective, follow @DioknoEd on Twitter.

Friday, January 14, 2022

San Gabriel Valley report: New year, same old hate

SCREEN CAPTURE
AAPI in California's San Gabriel Valley rally against hate.

It may be 2022, but the hate acts against Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders continue like it was still 2020 or 2021 during which almost a third of AAPI have suffered from the racist attacks according to a new survey of California's San Gabriel Valley.

The Stop Hate Community Survey of Asian and Asian Americans found that nearly 31% of Asian American respondents said they or their family experienced a hate incident based on their race or ethnicity since the COVID-19 outbreak, with most of these incidents involving insults or verbal abuse.

The report surveyed AAPI residents of Los Angeles' eastern suburbs in the San Gabriel Valley, where a large concentration of Chinese, Koreans, Vietnamese, Filipinos and South Asians reside. 

Most of the hate acts have been insults or verbal abuse. At a press conference Wednesday, Hanna Chang described one incident as she was recharging her car in front of a police station, an individual, apparently impatient at her progress shouted, "F---king chink!"

Racist abuse “can happen anywhere, and this was in the middle of the day, in front of a lot of people,” she said.

Conducted by the Asian Youth Center (AYC) and Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Los Angeles (Advancing Justice – LA), the report also found:
  • 37% of respondents said they noticed an increase in racial discrimination or harassment in their community since the COVID-19 outbreak began in 2020, and
  • 59% said they have changed the way they feel and behave when they leave home.
  • 49% of parent respondents indicated they have concerns about their children returning to school related anti-Asian hate and bullying.

The Chinese Cultural Center is in Hacienda Heights in the San Gabriel Valley.


Survey respondents described getting verbally assaulted while shopping, observing hate speech and graffiti on Asian owned businesses, feeling anxiety about their safety when leaving home, and being concerned about physical attacks for the first time as an Asian American. The majority of respondents did not feel there is support in their community for victims of racial discrimination or harassment.

When asked to select resources that would be most effective in preventing discrimination, most respondents selected community patrol/neighborhood watch programs, followed by stronger community-police relations and cross-cultural events, such as community gatherings and celebrations.

About 3 out of 4 parent respondents felt that more training for teachers and staff and clearer protocols on how schools address violence and bullying would help them and their children feel safer returning to school.

Many respondents also felt their communities in general needed more mental health/substance abuse services, childcare/youth activities, and senior services. The full survey report is available at: www.aycla.org/survey.

The survey corresponds with other reports throughout the country citing the alarming rise in anti-Asian acts. Los Angeles County found that anti-Asian crime has risen 73% in 2021. New York City reports a rise of hate crimes against AAPI by 361%.

“AYC proposes to address these findings in several ways,” said Michelle Freridge, AYC Executive Director, “First, we will continue addressing Anti-Asian Hate incidents in the San Gabriel Valley area of Los Angeles County through in-language community education, engagement, and mobilization activities to empower residents to prevent, address, and recover from anti-Asian hate incidents.”

In addition, AYC is implementing:
  • Youth-led social justice projects with high school students in Los Angeles and the San Gabriel Valley through the Youth & Parent Leadership Development Program and Dream Allies Network;
  • After-school programming in Alhambra Unified School District and the San Gabriel Unified School District for K-8 students has incorporated classes from the Asian American Education Project curriculum and anti-bullying lessons; and
  • In partnership with LA vs. Hate, AYC will continue to create and support local initiatives working to stop hate in our communities, such as LA vs Hate’s Stronger Together mural project by local artist MariNaomi. Through community events, public art, and social media outreach, we will continue working with other local partners to engage the community and amplify the message that any kind of hate is unacceptable.
“San Gabriel Valley is one of the most important Asian communities in California and we are here for individuals who don’t know where to turn for confidential, safe support," said Connie Chung Joe, CEO, Advancing Justice – LA. "
We can help in their languages. We will continue to fight for public programs and services that serve the diverse and complex needs of AAPIs in this community.”


Shopping malls in the San Gabriel Valley reflect their clientele.


Based on the survey results, AYC and Advancing Justice – LA will work to engage policymakers and advocate for the resources requested by the community. The organizations also plan to expand their existing efforts to address anti-Asian hate and discrimination.

Advancing Justice – LA prioritizes programs that address anti-Asian discrimination and hate in the following ways:
  • Reaching the most vulnerable immigrant communities through it's Asian Language Help lines and targeted community outreach. AAAJ-LA provides free victims and legal assistance in Mandarin, Cantonese, Korean, Tagalog, Thai, Vietnamese, and English.
  • Public communications and awareness campaigns which include opeds and national/local PSAs through ethnic and mainstream media partners, allied organizations, and social media outlets. This includes advertising in multiple Asian languages to raise awareness and counter-messaging against harmful rhetoric.
  • Amplifying AAPI voices by speaking out on behalf of the community in public forums, discussions, and briefings with national, state, county, and city officials, legislators, nonprofit leaders and corporations.
  • Bystander Intervention Trainings: Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles has partnered with AYC and a coalition of community-based organizations to deliver Bystander Intervention Trainings for residents throughout Southern California. Currently, trainings are offered for adults in English and can be accessed here. AYC just completed translating the curriculum into Chinese, so trainings will be available in Chinese soon. 
Those who have been victims of hate should consider reporting with LA County by calling 211 or using LA County’s LA vs. Hate online form. Hate incidents can also be reported to Stop AAPI Hate, a national coalition aimed at addressing anti-Asian American discrimination.

EDITOR'S NOTE: For additional commentary, news and views, raves and rants from an AAPI perspective, follow me on Twitter @DioknoEd.


Saturday, July 4, 2020

Community activist named new CEO of Advancing Justice-LA

SCREEN CAPTURE / YOUTUBE
Connie Chung Joe will take help of Asian American legal advocatcy group.
An activist with deep roots in Asian American community was named Wednesday as the new CEO of Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Los Angeles (Advancing Justice-LA) announces esteemed community leader Connie Chung Joe as CEO. 

Joe joins the nation’s foremost Asian American, Native Hawaiian, and Pacific Islander (AANHPI) civil rights organization during a historic time for social justice. As an attorney and activist, she will lead Advancing Justice-LA in its long-standing commitment to providing advocacy for and legal services to AANHPI’s whose needs and voices are as diverse as its languages.

“I am honored to take the helm at Advancing Justice-LA, an organization I deeply respect for being at the forefront of AANHPI issues while also responding to the individual needs of our community. Now more than ever, with so much occurring in our society with anti-Asian discrimination due to COVID-19 and the Blacks Lives Matter movement to address systemic racism, I feel drawn to Advancing Justice-LA’s work in social justice and civil rights. I look forward to continuing the legacy,” said Joe.

“After an extensive search process, we are excited to welcome Connie to Advancing Justice-LA. She brings vision, experience, and passion to this role, marking a new chapter in our 37-year history. Her experience in growing organizations and building strong teams will guide Advancing Justice-LA through a successful transition,” said Nita Song, Board Chair, Advancing Justice-LA.

For over 11 years, Connie Chung Joe served as Executive Director of Korean American Family Services (KFAM). Under her leadership, KFAM grew from 12 to 43 staff that now serves over 7,000 clients annually with mental health, domestic violence, and child welfare services. 


In 2017, Connie was named by then California Assemblymember Sebastian Ridley-Thomas and LA County Board of Supervisor Mark Ridley-Thomas as one of the 40 Under 40 Emerging Civic Leaders. In 2016, she was appointed by CA Senate President Pro Tempore Kevin de Leon to the Domestic Violence Advisory Council. 

Connie has been honored for her work by the Asian Pacific Women’s Center and the Asian American Drug Abuse Program. She has served as a vice-chair on the Board of Directors at the Asian Pacific Policy and Planning Council (A3PCON), a consortium of over 40 AAPI community organizations. She co-chaired A3PCON’s Mental Health Committee and co-founded the Human Trafficking Task Force. Connie also co-chaired the API Domestic Violence Task Force of LA. Connie has been a public interest lawyer at the Housing Rights Center in Los Angeles and the American Civil Liberties Union in Chicago, Illinois. 

She received her BA in Spanish and International Relations from USC and her JD from Georgetown University Law Center.

“Connie is a force for good in Los Angeles. I know she will continue our fight against racism while celebrating, protecting and uplifting the diverse people in our AANHPI community,” said Stewart Kwoh, Founder, Advancing Justice-LA. 

Wednesday, March 18, 2020

Kamala Haris wants Facebook to clamp down on misleading GOP advertisements about the Census

SCREEN CAPTURE / CSPAN
Kamala Harris wants Facebook to take stronger measures against misleading ads.
ASAM NEWS

US Senator Kamala Harris (D-Calif.) took Facebook executives to task over misleading 2020 Census advertisements on its site.
In a letter to Facebook CEO Mark Zuckerberg and COO Sheryl Sandberg on March 5, Harris criticized the company for its “failure to enforce [its] policies banning misinformation.”

Facebook had run “thousands” of ads from Donald Trump Make America Great Again, a fundraising arm of President Donald Trump’s campaign and the Republican National Committee, asking users to take the “Official 2020 Congressional District Census.”

“President Trump needs you to take the Official 2020 Congressional District Census today. We need to hear from you before the most important election in American history,” the ad said. It then asked users to “respond NOW” and text “TRUMP to 8022,” according to The New York Times.

But instead of being taken to the U.S. Census Bureau government site, users were instead redirected to a Trump campaign page with “misleading information on how to take the census,” including dates, times, locations, and methods, according to Harris’s letter. The census had not begun to survey the public at the time.

The ads were still approved and ran for “hours,” even after the company was made aware of the misinformation by Vanita Gupta, president of The Leadership Conference on Civil and Human Rights.

Harris is just one of the Democrats criticizing Facebook for running the misleading ads. House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) called it “a robust unacceptable interference in the census” in a press conference Thursday, The Hill reported.

In response, a Facebook spokesman replied that they received Harris’s letter and “look forward to clarifying the policies Facebook has in place to prevent confusion around the official U.S. census.”

The advertisements have since been removed, but Harris is concerned that the company’s initial approval of the ads is a signal that Facebook is “now backing away from full enforcement of those policies.” Such misinformation in future elections could result in voter disenfranchisement.

It is also a concern for the Asian American and Pacific Islander communities, which the U.S. Census Bureau has recognized as difficult to count, due to language barriers and the “large number of first-generation immigrants, estimated to be at least two-thirds of the over 22 million AAPI in the US,” according to AAPI Data.

There’s already confusion, worry, and lack of knowledge about the census, which is why activist groups are taking it upon themselves to educate communities on the benefits of taking the census, including how the information may be used.

Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus member An Le had expressed concern about non-English speakers, particularly in California, who would fall through the cracks without appropriate outreach and information.

Gupta echoed the concerns of Harris and other civil rights leaders in a recent statement:

“While we’re gratified that Facebook shut down Trump’s attempt to sow confusion about how and when to participate in the 2020 census, it’s disturbing that the ads weren’t immediately removed,” Gupta said. “We will continue to hold Facebook accountable to enforce it. Nothing should distract from making sure everyone gets counted.”

Sunday, December 8, 2019

Court rejects lawsuit against California law allowing minority representation in government


A lawsuit challenging the California Voting Rights Act was dismissed Dec. 4, giving Asian Americans and other communities of color the means to improve representation in local governments.

“We applaud the Ninth Circuit’s decision affirming the dismissal of Higginson v. Becerra et al., a lawsuit that challenged the constitutionality of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA) and sought to overturn the use of district elections in the City of Poway," said a statement of legal advocates, including Asian Americans Advancing Justice, Los Angeles.

"This decision upholds the California Voting Rights Act as an important pillar of democracy and helps us continue our work fighting for fair representation for Asian Americans and other communities of color."


The CVRA, a 2001 state law that expands on the federal Voting Rights Act with the intention of ensuring minority voters have an opportunity to elect candidates of choice, has been used successfully to address concerns that at-large voting systems too often dilute the voting strength of minority groups. District-based election systems, as an alternative to at-large elections, consistently help under-represented groups elect representatives of their choice from their own communities.

In October, the City of Poway, located in San Diego County, moved from an at-large election system in which all voters choose all council members, to smaller neighborhood districts in which residents elect their own representative. City officials said they made the change fearing they would be sued for violating the CVRA.

The following day, Don Higginson, a former City of Poway mayor, sued the city and the State of California alleging the move and CRVA are unlawful.

“The California Voting Rights Act helps ensure that members of minority communities have access to meaningful representation, which is the bedrock of democracy. The CVRA, in certain circumstances, requires jurisdictions to move from at-large election systems to other models that give minority communities a better chance to elect candidates of choice," continued the statement.

At-large election systems, when used in local jurisdictions where there is racially polarized voting, prevent minority communities from electing their chosen candidates, even in some cases where those communities are very substantial portions of a local jurisdiction’s population. In such instances, the CVRA helps minority communities advocate for a fairer system.

Jonathan Stein, Voting Rights Program Manager & Staff Attorney at Advancing Justice – ALC, says, “Despite being a progressive state, California has a long way to go before it builds a fair and representative democracy, in which the electorate and our democratic institutions reflect the full diversity of our population. The CVRA is an essential tool for building a better democracy in California. This ruling allows us to continue this work, by confirming that the CVRA is constitutional, as the lower federal court and a California court have previously concluded.”

“We are grateful to our clients, Jacqueline Contreras , Xavier Flores, Hiram Poway and Judy Ki, who are standing up for a fairer democracy," said 
Molly Matter of Amend Law LLC.

"We are also grateful for the Ninth Circuit's decision, which affirms baseless grievances against civil rights legislation will be dismissed. Just as Supreme Court Justice Blackmun warned in his dissent in the Bakke decision nearly forty years ago, 

"We cannot—we dare not—let the Equal Protection Clause perpetuate racial supremacy," said Matter.






Advancing Justice - ALC and Advancing Justice - Los Angeles are co-counsel with MALDEF and Molly Matter of Amend Law LLC for community members who intervened in the case in support of the California Voting Rights Act.



LOS ANGELES – Civil rights advocates are asking a federal court to allow them to intervene in a lawsuit that seeks to overturn the City of Poway’s election system and challenges the constitutionality of the California Voting Rights Act (CVRA).
In a motion filed Monday, MALDEF (Mexican American Legal Defense and Educational Fund), Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Los Angeles (Advancing Justice-LA), Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Asian Law Caucus (Advancing Justice-ALC), and the Law Office of Joaquin G. Avila are seeking to intervene on behalf of several residents of Poway who petitioned the court to join the case to defend their access to political representation as required by the CVRA. Additionally, the California League of United Latin American Citizens and residents in the Antelope Valley Community College District also are seeking to intervene in the case to protect the right of California voters to avail themselves of the protections of the California Voting Rights Act.
The CVRA, a 2001 state law that expands on the federal Voting Rights Act with the intention of ensuring minority voters have an opportunity to elect candidates of choice, has been used successfully to address concerns that at-large voting systems too often dilute the voting strength of minority groups. District-based election systems, as an alternative to at-large elections, consistently help under-represented groups elect representatives of their choice from their own communities. 
In October, the City of Poway, located in San Diego County, moved from an at-large election system in which all voters choose all council members, to smaller neighborhood districts in which residents elect their own representative. City officials said they made the change fearing they would be sued for violating the CVRA.
The following day, Don Higginson, a former City of Poway mayor, sued the city and the State of California alleging the move and CRVA are unlawful. 
"This contrived lawsuit is the courtroom embodiment of 'Make America Great Again' - an attempt to embed white voters' longstanding privilege," said Thomas A. Saenz, MALDEF president and general counsel. "However, there is no constitutional right to outvote minority voters in every election, and there is no constitutional right to have an elected body of close neighbors who cozily work together without particular knowledge of unrepresented portions of the local jurisdiction."
“District elections level the playing field for democracy,” said City of Poway resident Judy Ki.  “South Poway has a unique set of problems and needs a City Councilmember to address them.”
“Throughout California, the CVRA has been instrumental in jurisdictions converting to district elections,” noted Deanna Kitamura, Voting Rights Project Director at Asian Americans Advancing Justice-LA.  “We are fighting to uphold the legality of the CVRA to ensure that it continues to be available as a means to change electoral systems that dilute votes.”  
The civil rights groups are asking the court to allow them to join the lawsuit, arguing that City of Poway may lack the commitment to defend the CVRA. Lawyers for the residents and LULAC go on to argue that while the California attorney general’s office might defend the state law, it may not have the same interest in protecting the city’s self-imposed changes to its election system.
“Seeking the protections of the federal Voting Rights Act takes significant time and money, so much so that disenfranchised minority communities often find the law out of reach,” said Jonathan Stein, Staff Attorney and Program Manager for Voting Rights at Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Asian Law Caucus. “The CVRA is the only state-level alternative to the law in the nation that makes seeking relief easier for disenfranchised minority communities, which is exactly why it’s being targeted by conservative legal activists from the East Coast.”

Sunday, December 1, 2019

Immigrants shouldn't fear taking public assistance, say advocates




ASAM NEWS

Immigration advocates are urging immigrants who need public assistance should go ahead and apply despite efforts by the Trump White House to discourage that.

In a statement,Asian Americans Advancing Justice, Los Angeles pointed out that five separate courts have issued orders blocking Trump’s efforts to make it more difficult for immigrants to get green cards if they rely on government benefits. Since the statement was issued, a court in Oregon barred Trump from requiring proof of health insurance to get a visa, reported Time.

“We encourage all immigrants to continue using Medi-Cal, CalFresh and housing benefits to keep their families healthy and thriving. Go to the doctor, bring your children to their doctors, and keep accessing healthy, nutritious food. The use of these life-saving benefits will not affect your application for green cards within the United States,” Marianna Yamamoto, Health Access Project Coordinator.

Last month, courts in California, New York, Washington, Illinois and Maryland issued rulings blocking Trump’s efforts.

“The Rule is simply a new agency policy of exclusion in search of a justification,” Judge George Daniels of the U.S. District Court in Manhattan wrote in his ruling, according to CBS. “It is repugnant to the American dream of the opportunity for prosperity and success through hard work and upwards mobility.”

AAAJ, LA says a record 266,000 public comments were submitted about the public charge rules and most overwhelmingly opposed the new restrictions.

“The timing of these preliminary injunctions could not have been better. Covered California’s open enrollment period just began and will continue through January 30, 2020. Advancing Justice-LA and our collaborative of community-based partners throughout the state will be able to help community members to identify affordable coverage that meets their respective needs through Covered California," says Doreena Wong, Advancing Justice-LA’s Health Access Project Director.


"Because Medi-Cal has no enrollment deadline, we can also help individuals apply for Medi-Cal if they meet the income guidelines throughout the year,” says Wong.

Friday, October 18, 2019

LA chapter of Advancing Justice hobbled by layoffs

COURTESY OF BRYAN KIM
Former staff protest outside of Advancing Justice-LA's office.


By Brittney Le


Both sides of a labor dispute at Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Los Angeles are blaming the “historical underinvestment” in the organization for last week’s mass layoff of 20% of their staff. The layoffs came after a year of unsuccessful negotiations with the union.

“Morale has always been low at Advancing Justice-LA, and has continued to decline in recent years,” said former employee Alison Vu. “Understandably, staff are scared. It’s scary to know that the financial situation has supposedly declined so much that 1/5th of the staff has to be let go suddenly, and that their jobs could be next.”

Vu, who served as Communications Manager for over a year, was one of the 19 employees laid off last week. With the entire communications department gone, she explained how there’s no one left in Advancing Justice-LA to spread awareness and updates throughout the community via email, flyers, and social media.

The Board of Directors issued a statement describing the layoffs as “difficult,” but “critical” for the continuation of Advancing Justice-LA’s work moving forward.

“The decisions announced were made after extensive input and analysis with staff and leadership of Asian Americans Advancing Justice—Los Angeles in order to position our organization to be stronger and more financially sustainable in the future,” the board said.

Vu disagreed.

“While all of the staff who were let go were critical to the work that we were doing in the community, many were on the front lines in serving our community. Management and the Board laid off our only Vietnamese and Khmer (Cambodian) hotline staff. So now, if you call for assistance in Hindi, … Vietnamese, or Khmer, there is no one who will pick up the phone or help you” Vu said.

Both ESL / Civics instructors being laid off meant an end to the Civics & English as a Second Language (ESL) classes, which helped immigrants with citizenship interviews; the entire Youth and Parent Leadership Development unit was also let go, leading to the scheduled termination of immigrant youth school programs by the end of 2019.

Legal services provided to the community will likely be impacted as well.

“Our Litigation unit has so few staff left—and remaining staff must absorb departed staff members’ cases, because we have an ethical duty not to abandon our clients under any circumstances,” said Minju Cho, a former fellow at Advancing Justice-LA. “It is unfathomable to me what the Board and management is thinking.”

Cho was a Skadden Fellow in the Impact Litigation unit, focusing on immigrants’ rights. She worked with the union in helping to draft public messaging and organizing actions and has transferred to another organization for her fellowship due to the ongoing internal issues at Advancing Justice-LA.

Cho pointed out that the Board had previously identified certain union leaders to be laid off, so several implicated employees left the organization before the layoff last week. Advancing Justice-LA has allegedly not rehired for the several positions that were vacated in the past year, and tensions have been running high for months.

Three leaders in Impact Litigation, Census Outreach, and Voting Rights at the organization also resigned this week in solidarity with laid off staff.

“In its external messaging the Board and management constantly claim they respect the right of workers to organize, but the truth is they don’t,” said Cho. “Instead, they targeted outspoken union members and leaders for layoffs. In executing layoffs they violated the law by not bargaining over the layoffs and effects of layoffs with the union first, as well as by direct-dealing with laid off staff instead of going through the union.”

That is an accusation the board denies.

“All efforts to reset the organization for success are being done alongside contract negotiations with the union,” Advancing Justice-LA’s board said in its statement. “The Board and management fully support the right of staff to organize and will continue to work in good faith with the collective bargaining unit as we have from the beginning. Any characterizations of our intentions otherwise are not true.”

AsAmNews reached out to the Board with a set of questions, but it declined to answer and instead sent us only its statement.

Cho said that those laid off last week were only given a single day’s notice to wrap up all their work; the staffers were notified last Monday during a meeting that Tuesday would be their very last day.

The Board allegedly denied requests to give people an extra few days to finish up everything, which included informing clients and community members that they were let go, transferring files and work, and clearing their offices. She said people were locked out of their emails promptly at 5 pm, and private security guards were posted to ensure employees left the building. The union held a vigil that Monday to mourn the layoffs and a picket action the next day.

“It’s also devastating and traumatic to be forced to wrap up all of your work, say goodbye to your contacts, say goodbye to your colleagues, pack up all of your belongings, and everything else that comes with being forced to leave, in less than two business days,” explained Vu.” Even for those that were not laid off, they weren’t able to say goodbye to their friends, teammates, and coworkers.”

According to the union’s blog, management’s lack of action in addressing staff health and safety concerns due to faulty air conditioning resulted in unionization; the union was formally recognized in 2018, but over a year later, no contract that would protect union members has been signed.

Several months ago, as the Board was seeking a successor for founder and executive director Stewart Kwoh and financial issues rose to the surface, which resulted in the Board passing a motion that proposed “right-sizing” the organization.

Cho explained that the union has tried to bargain internally with management for a while now without going public. After repeated attempts to be heard by the Board went supposedly ignored, the union decided to create their blog Advancing Injustice–LA and a Twitter page.

The union claims the Board shared that it has no concrete plan for solving the financial crisis, and while staffers have communicated multiple cost-cutting alternatives to layoffs, “right-sizing” remained a part of the Board’s course of action.

The union has several clear goals they hope to achieve at this point, including a signed contract after bargaining with management, reinstatement for the most vulnerable individuals of the mass layoff, and fair severance packages. Cho said that some staffers were offered less than a week of severance pay.

At its recent 36th Anniversary Dinner, Advancing Justice-LA was scheduled to honor activist students supporting race-conscious admissions in the Harvard affirmative action lawsuit with the Education Impact Award. In support of the union, the students wrote a letter to Stewart Kwoh and Board Chair Nita Song denying the award and condemning the Board and management.

A GoFundMe page, created to help with rent and medical expenses, has exceeded its goal of $20,000 in just a few days.
_______________________________________________________________

Sunday, October 13, 2019

AAPI legal advocacy group lays off 20% of its staff

FILE PHOTO

ASAM NEWS


Asian American advocacy group Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles this week laid off 18 staffers, 20 percent for their staff. The advocacy group is one of LA’s top civil rights organization.

According to the LA ist, the organization let go a spokeswoman, labor rights lawyer, outreach staffers, bilingual phone operators, and citizenship teachers in response to what Rafu Shimpo reported as a $2 million budget shortfall.

“The layoff decision seems designed to strike more fear and anxiety among the remaining staff and would confirm management’s absence of good faith during negotiations, which began more than a year ago,” AFSCME International wrote in a statement. “We are shocked the board and management have, in announcing these layoffs, breached their obligation to bargain with the union first,”

The board of directors denied these layoffs are related to current labor negotiations.

“The decisions announced today were made after extensive input and analysis with staff and leadership of Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Los Angeles in order to position our organization to be stronger and more financially stable in the future. While difficult, actions taken were critical to allow us to continue the important work of advancing justice in AANHPI communities, all communities of color, immigrants and other marginalized groups moving forward. All efforts to reset the organization for success are being done alongside contract negotiations with the union. The board and management fully support the right of staff to organize and will continue to work in good faith with the collective bargaining unit as we have from the beginning. Any characterizations of our intentions otherwise are not true,” the board said.

Laid off staffer Alison Vu told LA ist that management had been struggling with finances for 10 to 15 years. Vu mentioned that the laid off hotline workers spoke different languages and now there will not be Khmer, Tagalog, Vietnamese, and Hindi staffers to answer the phone. While a 19th person would have been fired, a co-worker resigned to save another person’s job.

“The organization purporting to be the leader and services for that community is no longer the leader,” Vu said.

Advancing Justice – LA’s about-page describes the group as the “largest legal and civil rights organization for Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders (NHPI). Founded in 1983 as the Asian Pacific American Legal Center, Advancing Justice – LA serves more than 15,000 individuals and organizations every year.”

Sunday, August 18, 2019

Trump''s 'public charge' rule challenged by a bevy of lawsuits

Immigrants sworn in as new US citizens.

To no one's surprise, a host of lawsuits is challenging Donald Trump's proposed "public charge" law that would disqualify anyone, including legal immigrants, from US citizenship if they are using any government-funded assistance.

Nonprofits serving immigrant communities and advocates for racial equity, health, children, farmworkers, and working families Friday (Aug. 16) filed suit to block implementation of the Trump administration’s “public charge” regulation, which threatens millions of immigrant families — disproportionally families of color. 

“The public charge regulation is an attack on the culturally diverse families we serve, threatening their health and their very lives,” said Jane Garcia, chief executive officer of La Clínica de La Raza. “We will stand with our patients and their families and fight this.”

The lawsuit, La Clínica de la Raza et al. v. Trump et al., was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California. It asked the court to declare the regulation issued by the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) unlawful and unconstitutional. DHS finalized the regulation on August 14, 2019.

Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Los Angeles is one of the advocacy groups that have joined the suit. 

"This expansion of the rule is part and parcel of the administration's crusade to instill fear in immigrant communities of color,” said Laboni Hoq, litigation director at Advancing Justice - LA. “By including criteria such as English language proficiency as a negative factor for obtaining permanent residency, the administration is telling immigrants that they are not welcome here.  

"Xenophobia has no place in our country, let alone our laws." said Hoq.

Later in the day, California and several other states joined an earlier suit filed by San Francisco and Santa Clara Counties.

“This cruel policy would force working parents and families across the nation to forego basic necessities like food, housing, and healthcare out of fear. That is simply unacceptable,” California's Attorney General Xavier Becerra said in a statement announcing the lawsuit.

The state's suit was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of California and its other plaintiffs also include Maine, Oregon, Pennsylvania, and Washington, D.C. They argue that the rule violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment, is arbitrary and capricious and contrary to law.

Trump's new regulation targets programs that serve whole families — Medicaid, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program, and Section 8 housing assistance — meaning its impact will extend well beyond immigrants directly affected. As a result, experts warn, the regulation will result in increases in hunger, unmet health and housing needs, and poverty. Because affected immigrants are overwhelmingly immigrants of color, the rule is also expected to widen racial disparities. 

Independent analysts estimate that the regulation threatens millions of people. A significant portion of those threatened by the regulation were born in the U.S., and nearly a third of those are children.

In addition to La Clínica de la Raza and Advancing Justice-LA, the advocates' suit was joined by African Communities Together, the California Primary Care Association, the Central American Resource Center, the Council on American Islamic Relations - California, Farmworker Justice, the Korean Resource Center, the Legal Aid Society of San Mateo County, and Maternal and Child Health Access. The plaintiffs are represented by the National Immigration Law Center,  the National Health Law Program and the Western Center on Law and Poverty.




The complaint argues that the regulation was motivated by racial bias against nonwhite immigrants and asks the court to strike it down as a violation of Equal Protection under the Fifth Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. As indicators of a motivating racial animus, the complaint cites the administration’s acknowledgement that the policy will have a disparate impact on families of color, Trump’s own racist statements, and his administration’s other racially-biased policies.

“Donald Trump pushed to execute innocent Black men wrongly accused of murder. He called the white supremacists in Charlottesville ‘very fine people.’ He slurred Black immigrants from Haiti and Nigeria. And he froze or cancelled protected status for immigrants from majority-Black countries. Donald Trump’s words and his actions have consistently targeted Black families,” said Amaha Kassa, founder and executive director of African Communities Together.

“This rule change is a direct attack on communities of color and their families, and furthers this administration’s desire to make this country work primarily for the wealthy and white. Our immigration system cannot be based on the racial animosities of this administration, or whether or not people are wealthy,” said Antionette Dozier, senior attorney at the Western Center on Law and Poverty.

Plaintiffs also assert that the regulation violates the Administrative Procedure Act because it is contrary to law and arbitrary and capricious. The complaint also argues that the regulation is invalid because the official who approved its publication, Kenneth T. Cuccinelli, was appointed in violation of the Constitution’s Appointments Clause and the Federal Vacancies Reform Act.

More than 260,000 public comments were submitted on the draft regulation last fall, the vast majority in opposition. 

“This rule is a scare tactic designed to create fear and confusion in immigrant communities. The devastating effects will reach even further than the text of the rule itself, as immigrants and their families forgo vital food, housing, and health care services,” said Jane Perkins, legal director at the National Health Law Program.
_________________________________________________________________

Friday, June 14, 2019

Report dives deep into the impact of Asian immigrants to the US


When debating the benefits of immigrants, a new report says the economic impact of AAPI immigrants cannot be overlooked.

The report released Thursday (June 13) reveals there are more than 1.1 million Asian American immigrant-owned businesses in the U.S. -- nearly three times as many as the 389,000 businesses owned by native-born Asian Americans. Over a third of all immigrant-owned businesses in the country are owned by Asian Americans.

Advancing Justice-LA (Asian Americans Advancing Justice – Los Angeles) and Advancing Justice | AAJC (Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC) released a new report, "Inside the Numbers: How Immigration Shapes Asian American and Pacific Islander Communities," which details the diversity of the immigrant population within the Asian American and Pacific Islander community, including contributions to the U.S. economy. Highlights of the report was revealed in a forum held in Washington, DC.

“We have been advocating for policies that help our community, not hurt them. This report shows that long visa backlogs, constant attacks on the immigrant community, and enforcement efforts are having a negative effect in our community, but still our community is a resilient one,” said John C. Yang, President and Executive Director of Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC.


 “Growing up as an undocumented immigrant, I know how the right policies can have a positive impact and allow for immigrants and refugees in our community to more effectively contribute and even go on to become naturalized citizens and make their mark in the world.”

The report provides background on the immigration pathways that people take to come to the U.S. and analyzes key issues, such as how AAPIs are affected by current ineffective immigration policies and are suffering because of new policy proposals. From the impact of the Muslim and refugee bans and the rescission of DACA and Temporary Protected Status to the visa backlogs and long processing times to become naturalized citizens, the Asian American community is undeniably feeling the impact.

TWITTER / AAAJ
John C Yang, President and Executive Director of Asian Americans Advancing Justice | AAJC.introduced the report.

One of the disturbing chapters of the report focuses on the high number of T-Visas given to immigrants from Asian countries. T-Visas are given to some victims of human trafficking.

In 2017, the majority of T visa recipients (246 individuals, 52 percent) were from Asian countries, says the report. The Philippines alone accounted for 40 percent of the global total of T visas issued in 2017, and India 5 percent.

A large portion of the Filipino nationals who received T visas were victims of labor trafficking. According to a United Nations study, Filipino workers are usually trafficked through illegal recruitment in which they pay high fees for the promise of nonexistent jobs or jobs that pay less than those promised. According to a Polaris report, Filipino workers on temporary nonimmigrant visas have the second-highest rates of human trafficking after Mexicans.

There are nearly 3.7 million aspiring immigrants waiting for family preference visas, and more than 40% of the people stuck in the family backlogs are from Asia. In the final section in the report, Advancing Justice | AAJC and Advancing Justice-LA share several policy recommendations:
  • Pass legislation to update the family immigration system and resolve the problem of family backlogs.
  • Ask Congress to defund and repeal all iterations of the Muslim Ban and prevent any future president from enacting any new, similar bans.
  • Recommend the administration honor the requests of asylum seekers, without being criminalized, turned away, detained indefinitely, or separated from their families and cuts made to the enforcement, detention, and deportation budgets of ICE and CBP within the Department of Homeland Security.

In the current debate on immigration that is swirling through the country today, immigrants from Asia and their contributions to the overall welfare of the US are often not included despite the fact  The report should be must reading by Congress when proposing immigration reforms or countering the false allegations coming from the White House.

"Over 12 million Asian immigrants and 220,000 Pacific Islander immigrants live in the U.S., yet they are often overlooked in domestic policies and immigration policy," said Jeffer Giang, Research Analyst at Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Los Angeles. 

"In order for our communities to thrive, we need to reduce barriers to accessing critical services and opportunities," said Glang. "This report will help policy- and decision-makers need to better understand the contributions and needs of Asian Americans and Pacific Islanders in this country."

To read the complete report, click here.
________________________________________________________________________

Tuesday, February 12, 2019

Nepalese lawsuit claims racism behind Homeland Security's policy vs. TPS program


Immigrants from Nepal and Honduras and Nepal have filed a lawsuit alleging the Trump administration unfairly ended a program that allows them to live and work in the United States.
The lawsuit filed late Sunday (Feb. 10) in federal court in San Francisco alleges that the U.S. Department of Homeland Security's decision to end so-called temporary protected status, or TPS, for the countries was motivated by racism.
"I am proud to be a part of this lawsuit, for all the other Nepali TPS holders like me," said Keshav Raj Bhattarai, one of the six plaintiffs. "With TPS I have been able to build a new life here with my family and I have a found a stable job. When I see so many people's lives at risk in losing TPS, I am troubled to see that this country would harm its hardworking workers and people. I wish to continue working to support this country, and also continue supporting the rebuilding of Nepal, which is still recovering from the earthquake."
The class-action suit — which was filed on behalf of six immigrants and two of their American-born children — seeks to stop the unlawful termination of TPS for over 100,000 TPS holders from Honduras and Nepal and prevent the separation of tens of thousands of U.S. citizen children from their TPS-holder parents. 
"We bring evidence the Trump administration has repeatedly denigrated non-white non-European immigrants and reviewed TPS designations with a goal of removing such non-white non-European immigrants from the United States," said Minju Cho, a staff attorney at Asian Americans Advancing Justice in Los Angeles.
Besides the AAAJ-LA, the immigrant plaintiffs, who live California, Minnesota, Maryland, Virginia and Connecticut, are represented by the ACLU Foundation of Southern California, the ACLU Foundation of Northern California of Southern California, Asian Americans Advancing Justice-Asian Law Caucus, the National Day Laborer Organizing Network, and Sidley Austin.
The complaint alleges that, in terminating TPS for Honduras and Nepal, political appointees in the Department of Homeland Security deliberately ignored recommendations from U.S. Ambassadors and evidence of conditions on the ground. Instead, they predetermined that TPS must be terminated to further the President's "America First" policy, which seeks to exclude non-white, non-European immigrants. The complaint recites a litany of racist statements made by Donald Trump in reference to Latin American and South Asian countries and immigrants.
"TPS holders are valued members of our communities. They are parents to tens and thousands of U.S. citizen children. TPS is vital to people's ability to work and provide for themselves and their families," said Cho.
________________________________________________________________________________