Showing posts with label #AsianAmericanCandidates; #AsianAmericanInPoliticians. Show all posts
Showing posts with label #AsianAmericanCandidates; #AsianAmericanInPoliticians. Show all posts

Sunday, November 6, 2016

Fears arise of efforts to intimidate or suppress AAPI voters


THE 2016 election season is coming down to the wire on both national and local elections. With so much at stake, 245 AAPI candidates running for office and driven by the most contentious presidential campaign in recent memory, the effort to push AAPI voters to register and to the polls has been extensive. 

It’s no secret that in preparation for this election has included many attempts to suppress voters of color—be it North Carolina’s alleged illegal cancellation of voter registrations or the threat of voter intimidation tactics by White supremacists in states such as Pennsylania. Now, officials in historically Republican states are allegedly using harmful—and sometimes illegal—tactics to keep the voters of color from swinging the states blue, reports NBC News.

As the fastest growing ethnic group in the country, AAPI have shown to be leaning towards the Democrats, mainly because of the anti-immigrant rhetoric coming from the GOP candidate for president, Donald Trump. The Latino voters, under the same reasoning, have moved even more to the left, according to some studies. African/American voters are almost entirely in the Democratic camp because of the racist views expressed by the Trump.

To counter the shift to the left by voters of color, several states have implemented laws that are making voting more difficult for minorities.

Responding to a wave of new state voter identification and proof of citizenship laws, the Asian American Legal Defense & Education Fund (AALDEF) will monitor more than 100 poll sites to ensure compliance with the Voting Rights Act and the Help America Vote Act.


 "In the 2012 elections, Asian/Americans had to overcome numerous obstacles to exercise their right to vote," said Jerry Vattamala, AALDEF Democracy Program Director. "AALDEF volunteers identified mistranslated ballots, interpreter shortages that led to Asian American voters being turned away, and poll workers who made hostile and racist remarks about Asian American voters. 

This Tuesday, Election Day, "AALDEF will guard against the disenfranchisement of new citizens and limited English proficient voters," said Vattamala.

The 42-year old nonpartisan organization will dispatch more than 800 attorneys, law students, and community volunteers to polling places in 14 states and Washington, DC to document voting problems in the 2016 elections.

These polling places are in areas with large numbers of newly-registered Asian American voters; jurisdictions in which Asian-language assistance is provided; and sites where Asian Americans have reported voting barriers or intimidation in recent elections. 

Attorneys will check whether Asian-language voting assistance has been provided (such as ballots, interpreters, signs and voting materials) and whether provisional ballots are offered to voters whose names are not in voter lists. Attorneys will report on whether voter identification requirements are implemented in a non-discriminatory manner.

Vattamala cited a 2016 AALDEF case in which a Texas election law was struck down under the Voting Rights Act because it improperly restricted access to interpreters, Vattamala said he received a complaint this week from an Asian/American voter improperly denied language assistance during early voting in Texas.





Multilingual volunteers will be at poll sites to take complaints from voters about election irregularities and other barriers to voting. Voters can also report Election Day problems to AALDEF's toll-free hotline at 800-966-5946, or by e-mail at votingrights@aaldef.org.

AALDEF is partnering with 121 national and local groups, law firms, and student associations to mobilize volunteers for Election Day.


New voting restrictions in 14 states have had a significant impact on minority voters. Courts have successfully struck down some of these regulations, but the threat to equal access to the ballot box remains. Given that this year’s election will be the first without the full protections of the Voting Rights Act of 1964, it’s essential that voters who have historically faced discrimination at the polls can fulfill their civic duty with in-language assistance or help at the polls and without fear of intimidation.

“As we head into to the first presidential election since 1965 without the full protection of the Voting Rights Act, the 888-API-VOTE hotline is even more critical to protect and serve our electorate,” said Christine Chen, executive director of Asian and Pacific Islander American Vote (APIAVote). 
RELATED:
"This election hotline not only provides AAPI voters essential in-language assistance, but it also ensures that all voters, regardless of proficiency in English, will have equitable access to the ballot box,” said Chen.

Voting problems are occurring in states like Arizona, Colorado, Nevada, Virginia and Ohio. In Texas, specifically, the Mexican American Legal Defense Fund won a court case last week (Oct. 28) ordering Bexar County election officials “to immediately remove all illegal voter ID signs that contained false information,” NBC News reports. In addition, the failure for officials to provide bilingual voting information on their websites violates the Voting Rights Act.

Efforts to ensure voter intimidation  or harassment isn't allowed is severely hampered this year because of a 2013 decision by the conservative-dominated U.S. Supreme Court that severely gutted the Voting Rights Act of 1965.

As a result of that decision, in Shelby County v. Holder, the Justice Department will send observers only to jurisdictions where it already has court approval, according to the New York Times. That means only seven counties or jurisdictions in Alaska, California, Louisiana and New York will have Department of Justice observers.

“We do not want to be in the position we’re in,” Vanita Gupta, the top civil rights official at the DOJ, said in an interview. “There’s no doubt that we’re going to be spread thinner,” she added, “but our hope and our intention is that we are going to have a very robust monitoring program” on Election Day.

Hence, the need for independent observers and AAPI civil rights organizations are doing their best to step up to the plate.

“Ensuring that all voters know their rights at the polls is critical to their participation this November," said Mee Moua, executive director and president of Advancing Justice | AAJC.  As Asian Americans continue to grow in population, and turn out to vote, we must do everything we can to support their participation and make visible their political impact.”

Unless you've been living under a rock the last year, we've all heard Donald Trump claim that the elections are rigged and have asked his supporters to go to the polls to ensure that nothing "funny" is going on. 

A study by Professor Justin Levitt at Loyola University of the actual incidences of voter fraud from 2000 to 2014 pretty much debunked the claims of voter fraud. According to Levitt, there were only 31 cases of voter impersonation fraud during those years. There were more than a billion votes cast. Actual voter fraud is almost unheard of in the United States.

Despite the debunking of voter fraud, Trump's followers - if nothing else, - are passionate. Answering Trump's call, neo-Nazis, anti-government militias and white supremacists claim  to be sending "monitors" to the polls this Tuesday.


Dale Ho, director of the ACLU's Voting Rights Project. pointed out in a New York Times oped that a Trump supporter recently told The Boston Globe that he would racially profile “Mexicans. Syrians. People who can’t speak American.” And he wasn’t shy about what he’d do next: “I’m going to go right up behind them,” he said, and “make them a little bit nervous.”

"We’re witnessing merely the latest round of efforts to delegitimize and exclude minority and immigrant voters with baseless allegations of fraud. But our commitment to universal suffrage demands that every eligible voter who wants to vote has the chance, free from intimidation and harassment," wrote Ho.

"In this election, unnecessary barriers to the ballot and calls to racially profile voters are the real threats. Voter fraud is not."
###

Wednesday, June 8, 2016

Asian vs. Asian: Ro Khanna edges incumbent Mike Honda with 177 votes


Ro Khanna and Rep. Mike Honda will battle each other in November.
Reprinted from AsAm News

Challenger Ro Khanna squeaked by eight-time incumbent Mike Honda in a hotly contested California congressional race in the only Asian American majority district in the continental United States Tuesday.

With 100 percent of the precincts reporting, Khanna won 33,785(38.3%)of the votes to Honda’s 33,608 (38.1 percent). That’s a difference of just 177 votes.

The race in Santa Clara County sets up a rematch of the general election in 2014 when Honda narrowly defeated Khanna by just 5,000 votes. Since neither candidate received a majority. a runoff will be held. Under California’s open primary system, the top two vote-getters, despite both being Democrats, will face off.

As the results came in, Khanna sounded upbeat and Honda, who returned to Washington D.C. rather than watch the results from his home district, remained determined.

“I have never taken any of my campaigns for granted, and I am ready to fight tooth and nail ahead of Nov. 8.” Honda said in a statement.

RELATED: Is the Asian/American vote being ignored?
“I was shocked and ecstatic and very, very humbled when I heard the results,” Khanna said to the Mercury News. “It shows that my message is really resonating and people want change.”

Honda has been beleaguered by an ethics probe stemming from the 2014 election when he was accused of using staff resources and tax dollars for his campaign.

Khanna has transformed from his technology heavy image of 2014 to a candidate in touch with local issues in 2016.

“We know the turnout will be higher in the fall, and to the extent that more traditional Democrats will come out, that will be a plus for Honda,” said political analyst Larry Gerston. “But we also know there is a very strong undercurrent of anti-incumbent sentiment, so that will be a plus for Khanna. Both candidates can walk away from this with some satisfaction but also fear.”

###

Monday, April 4, 2016

Technicality forces Lindy Li withdrawal from Pennsylvania congressional primary

Congressional candidate Lindy Li ponders her future.

By Louis Chan
Reprinted from AsAm News


Just three weeks before the Pennsylvania primary, the woman largely believed to be the most viable candidate for the Democratic nomination to run in the state’s 6th Congressional District has dropped out of the race following a court defeat.

Lindy Li, 25, would have been the youngest member of Congress if elected.

“I’m truly sorry I couldn’t hold onto our dream. My heart is in pieces,” Li said to her supporters on Facebook.

Her storybook candidacy ended when her Democratic opponent won a court challenge invalidating many of the signatures she gathered to file her candidacy. 1,000 signatures are required for a Congressional candidate to appear on the ballot. She says she collected 2,500.

RELATED: Made in America: Meet Lindy Li
“One of our notaries failed to keep a notary log that is required by law. This oversight disqualified a significant portion of our signatures, placing us below the legal requirement. I take full responsibility for what happened,” said Li.

The court challenge was filed by her opponent Mike Parrish.

That leaves Parrish as the only Democrat left in the race. Li had previously declared her candidacy in the 7th Congressional District near Philadelphia, but she would have faced two other Democratic candidates and if she had won the primary, a 3-term Republican incumbent. The Democratic leadership convinced her to move her candidacy to the 6th District where Parrish has raised only $26,445 for his campaign compared to $389,254 raised by Li in the last campaign filing.

RELATED: Lindy Li switches her district in effort to win seat
“This episode leaves me with no bitterness or resentment — only love. When the court adjourned, I embraced with warmth those who sought to end our campaign. While disappointed, I wish my opponent the very best and will devote my time now to supporting other candidates and serving our community.

“This campaign was a labor of love. I will run for public office again to serve our country and hope you will remain with me. Thank you so much for sharing this journey with me.”

Some of her supporters on Facebook urged her to run as a write-in candidate. In fact, some even pledged to write her name on the ballot.

Li acknowledged that as a possibility, but seemed to douse cold water on the idea.

“I could run as a write-in candidate. Just wondering if it would be better to save our resources for next time, since it would be incredibly expensive.”